Then they assume they can understand the structure of the virus that isn’t there. The authors blithely assume they can somehow infer that the virus exists in the first place, without having an isolated specimen. No standard against which to compare the reliability of the test. A diagnostic test for the virus, but there is no virus.
Those quotes from the study are astounding. The study is titled, “Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR.”
But we will create and use a test to detect it. TRANSLATION: Our new test to detect the new virus? We don’t have the new virus. “The workflow reliably detects 2019-nCoV, and further discriminates 2019-nCoV from SARS-CoV.” Actually, we have no proof there is a new coronavirus. Therefore, all our assumptions are made out of nothing. We ASSUME, because we don’t have the new COVID virus. We ASSUME this new virus exists and is closely related to an older coronavirus. TRANSLATION: We HAVE developed a diagnostic test to detect the new COVID virus. “Here we present a validated diagnostic workflow for 2019-nCoV its design relying on close genetic relatedness of 2019-nCoV with SARS coronavirus, making use of synthetic nucleic acid technology.” TRANSLATION: We want to develop a test to detect the new COVID virus without having the virus. “We aimed to develop and deploy robust diagnostic methodology for use in public health laboratory settings without having virus material available.” These quotes should be engraved in stone above the entrance to a museum dedicated to the history of medical fraud. This one formed the basis for the first PCR test aimed at detecting the COVID virus all over the world. The pandemic is a fraud, down to the root of the poisonous tree.Īnd now, let’s move on to a second key document. THEREFORE, NO ONE HAS PROVED THAT IT EXISTS.Īs if this were not a revelation to shock the world, the CDC goes on to say they are presenting a diagnostic PCR test, in that very paper I’m citing, to detect the virus-that-hasn’t-been-isolated…and the test is looking for RNA which is PRESUMED to come from the virus that hasn’t been proved to exist.Īnd using this test, the CDC and every other public health agency in the world would go on to count COVID cases and deaths…and governments instituted lockdowns and economic devastation using those case and death numbers as justification. Why? Obviously, because no one has it.Ī further tip-off is the use of the word ‘isolates.” This means NO ISOLATED VIRUS IS AVAILABLE.Īnother way to put it: NO ONE HAS AN ISOLATED SPECIMEN OF THE COVID-19 VIRUS. One of the two most powerful public health agencies in the world can’t obtain the virus from anywhere. The use of the term “quantified” in that phrase means: the CDC has no virus, because it is unavailable. The key phrase there is: “Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available…”Įvery object that exists can be quantified, which is to say, measured.
#Hydra worm virus pdf#
The CDC document is titled, “CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel.” It was originally published in February 2020, in the very early days of the “pandemic,” and it’s latest revision was published in July 2021 (rev: 07, 7/21).īuried deep in the document, in a section titled, “Performance Characteristics,” we have this: “Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA…” (document page 40, pdf page 41) But we want to find out whether you have it.” This is on the order of a doctor telling a patient, “I’m going to test you for Disease XQ.” But they’re going to devise a test for it anyway. The documents, written by the builders of the test, admit an isolated specimen of the virus is NOT AVAILABLE. These documents reveal the hoax at the bottom of the test for a virus that doesn’t exist. Lately, there has been a resurgence of interest in one or two documents I cited months ago. These are the consequences that flowed from the fake “discovery” of a new virus. The introduction of a highly destructive vaccine as the solution. The development of a diagnostic test to detect the virus that doesn’t exist.īased on the test, the publishing of sky-high case numbers, all of which are obviously meaningless.īased on the false case numbers, and absurd computer projections of cases and deaths to come, the imprisoning of people in their homes, the closure and destruction of businesses, the torpedoing of economies, and then… Throughout this false pandemic, I’ve been listing and explaining the falling dominos: